10 Companies That Rebranded: Before & After Examples & Analysis

10 Companies That Rebranded: Before & After Examples & Analysis

A new logo is the victory flag you plant at the end of a long, bloody, and expensive war. The war is the rebranding process—a brutal campaign of strategy, internal politics, and ruthless business decisions.

Too many people confuse the flag with the fight. They see a company unveil a new font and think, “That's nice.” They miss the real story: the billion-dollar gamble, the attempt to escape a toxic reputation, or the quiet admission that the old way of doing things is dead.

We're going to dissect 10 of these campaigns. Some are masterstrokes of business strategy. Others are baffling displays of corporate ego. 

All of them are lessons in what to do—and what not to do—when you’re thinking about changing your flag.

First, Why Do Companies Even Bother Rebranding?

It’s an expensive, disruptive, and risky process. No sane CEO undertakes it lightly. There is usually a handful of non-negotiable business reasons that drive the decision.

To Signal a Fundamental Change (Mergers, New Leadership)

A rebrand is the most potent way to tell the world, “We are not who we used to be.” This is essential after a merger, an acquisition, or when a new leader arrives to gut the old strategy and start fresh. The old visual identity carries the baggage of the past; a new one signals a clean break.

To Reposition in the Market (Moving Upmarket, Targeting a New Audience)

The brand that got you your first 1,000 customers might not get you the next million. Companies rebrand to shift perception. They might need to look more premium, appeal to a younger demographic, or pivot from being a product company to a service company. The visual identity has to match the new ambition.

To Escape a Negative Past (Scandals, Bad Reputations)

When your company name is synonymous with a scandal, you have a serious problem. Sometimes the only solution is a complete identity change. It's a way to distance the future of the business from a toxic history, creating a new entity that can, hopefully, build fresh trust.

To Simplify and Clarify (Confusing Names, Outdated Visuals)

Some brands simply become cluttered over time. Their name might be a relic of a bygone era, their logo might be impossible to use on digital platforms, or their message might be hopelessly confusing. A rebrand can cut through the noise, simplify the name, and create a clear, modern identity that just works.

The Rebrand Review: 10 Case Studies Dissected

Now for the main event. For each company, we'll look at the backstory that forced the change, the change itself, and the final verdict on whether it was a stroke of genius or a costly mistake.

1. Apple: The Rebirth of Cool

• The Backstory: By 1997, Apple was on the brink of bankruptcy. Its product line was a confusing mess, and its brand, represented by a friendly rainbow apple, felt more like a holdover from the hobbyist computer club era than a mark of a serious technology company.
• The Change: When Steve Jobs returned, one of his first moves was to ditch the rainbow. He replaced it with a sleek, monochrome logo. It wasn't a radical redesign of the shape, but a strategic draining of the colour.
• The Verdict: A masterclass. The new logo was a perfect visual metaphor for the latest Apple strategy: focus, simplicity, and premium design. It looked incredible stamped on the new iMacs and, later, iPods. It signalled that Apple was no longer a quirky computer company but a design powerhouse.

2. Airbnb: From Air Mattress to Global Belonging

• The Backstory: Airbnb’s original script logo was fine. It was functional. But it did nothing to communicate the company's grander vision. It was the logo for a service, not a global community.
• The Change: In 2014, they introduced the “Bêlo,” a symbol meant to represent people, places, love, and the ‘A' of Airbnb. The internet immediately decided it looked like various parts of the human anatomy, and the mockery was relentless.
• The Verdict: A controversial but ultimately brilliant strategic move. Airbnb weathered the initial storm because the new identity was part of a bigger shift towards a brand focused on “belonging.” The Bêlo became a flexible and recognisable symbol of the brand's core mission, far more powerful than the generic script it replaced.

3. Dunkin': Just the Name, Thanks

• The Backstory: Dunkin' Donuts had sold far more coffee than doughnuts for years. Its own customers were already shortening the name to just “Dunkin'.” The full name limited the brand's potential to compete with Starbucks as a beverage-first destination.
• The Change: In 2019, they made it official. They dropped the “Donuts” from the name, keeping the iconic pink and orange colours and friendly font. It was a simplification, not a revolution.
• The Verdict: A textbook example of a smart, customer-led rebrand. They didn't throw away decades of brand equity; they simply edited the brand to reflect the reality of their business. It was a confident move that clarified their position in the market.

4. Mailchimp: Resisting the Urge to “Bland”

• The Backstory: Mailchimp built its business on a quirky, friendly, slightly weird brand personality, personified by its mascot, Freddie. As the company grew into a major player, the temptation to “professionalise”—which often means “sterilise”—the brand must have been immense.
• The Change: Instead of ditching the quirk, they doubled down. In their 2018 rebrand, they refined Freddie, making him more straightforward and iconic. They paired him with a bolder wordmark and a playful yellow brand colour.
• The Verdict: Fantastic. This was a direct rejection of the “blanding” epidemic. Mailchimp understood that its personality was its greatest asset and chose to amplify it, not apologise. It proved that a major B2B company doesn't have to be boring.

5. Meta: The Great Escape

• The Backstory: The Facebook brand was radioactive. Between data privacy scandals, election controversies, and accusations of harming mental health, the name had become a liability. The company's ambitions in the “metaverse” were being overshadowed by the toxicity of its core social network.
• The Change: In 2021, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the corporate parent company would be renamed Meta. Facebook, the app, would still exist, but it would be a product under the Meta umbrella, alongside Instagram and WhatsApp.
• The Verdict: A strategically necessary, if completely transparent, manoeuvre. It's a classic case of rebranding to escape a negative reputation. It hasn't magically solved the company's problems, but it was a calculated corporate move to protect its future ventures from its past sins. The jury is still out on its long-term success.

6. Google: The Constant Gardener

• The Backstory: Google's original serif logo, designed in 1999, was a classic. But it was built for a world of desktop browsers. As the company became mobile-first and its brand appeared on everything from watches to cars, the detailed serif font became a technical and aesthetic limitation.
• The Change: In 2015, Google switched to a clean, geometric sans-serif font called Product Sans. It was simpler, more scalable, and felt friendlier. It was a significant change but retained the famous multi-colour sequence, ensuring continuity.
• The Verdict: The right move at the right time. This is how a mature brand evolves. It wasn't a panicked reaction but a thoughtful update to align the visual identity with the company's technological reality. They kept the soul of the brand while modernising the execution.

7. Accenture: Out of the Ashes

• The Backstory: Accenture used to be Andersen Consulting, the business and technology consulting division of the accounting firm Arthur Andersen. After a bitter and public dispute, the two split in 2000. Andersen Consulting was forced to rebrand under a new name within a year.
• The Change: “Accenture” was created from the phrase “Accent on the future.” A simple wordmark with a forward-pointing chevron accompanied it. The whole identity was designed to signal a complete break from the past.
• The Verdict: A huge success born of necessity. The name isn't the most inspiring, but the rebrand achieved its primary goal: it allowed the consulting business to survive and thrive, completely separating its identity from Arthur Andersen before that firm collapsed spectacularly under the Enron scandal in 2002.

8. Uber: The Identity Crisis

• The Backstory: Under founder Travis Kalanick, Uber was seen as aggressive and impersonal. In 2016, the company launched a rebrand to appear more human and reflect its global operations.
• The Change: They replaced the well-known ‘U' logo with an abstract shape that was supposed to represent the “bit” (technology) and the “atom” (the physical world). It was confusing, lacked a connection to the brand name, and was widely disliked.
• The Verdict: A mess. This felt like an ego-driven rebrand that was overthought to the point of nonsense. It solved no real problems and created new ones. Tellingly, two years later in 2018, they ditched it for a simple, clean wordmark using a custom font. They learned the hard way that clarity trumps cleverness.

9. Tropicana: The Catastrophic Redesign

• The Backstory: In 2009, Tropicana, owned by PepsiCo, decided its packaging looked dated. They wanted something more “modern” and “clean” for their Pure Premium orange juice line.
• The Change: They replaced the iconic image of an orange with a straw stuck in it with a generic stock photo-style glass of orange juice. The bold, arched Tropicana logo was replaced with a thin, vertical sans-serif font. The entire package became bland and unrecognisable.
• The Verdict: One of the most famous rebranding disasters of all time. Consumers couldn't find it on the shelf and, when they did, they felt the new design looked cheap and generic. Sales plummeted by over 20% in two months, costing the company millions. They quickly and wisely reverted to the old design.

10. Gap: The Blue Box Blunder

• The Backstory: Feeling its brand had become stale, clothing retailer Gap shocked the world in 2010 with a new logo. It was an unannounced, unexplained change that suddenly appeared on its website.
• The Change: The classic, all-caps serif font inside a navy blue box was replaced with a Helvetica wordmark and a small, awkwardly placed blue gradient square. It looked like a default logo from a cheap design program.
• The Verdict: An absolute train wreck. The public backlash was immediate and brutal. The new logo was seen as cheap, soulless, and insulting to the brand's heritage. The rebrand lasted six days before Gap executives surrendered and reinstated the old logo. It's a perfect lesson in misjudging your own brand equity.

The Hard Truths About Rebranding Your Business

What can a small business owner learn from these multi-million dollar wins and losses? A few things become painfully clear.

It's a Business Tool, Not an Art Project

Every successful rebrand on this list—Apple, Dunkin', Accenture—solved a clear business problem. The failures—Tropicana, Gap, Uber's 2016 attempt—were driven by vague desires to look “modern” or abstract ideas without connection to the customer.

Your Existing Customers Have a Vote

Tropicana and Gap forgot that their logos didn't just belong to them; they belonged to their customers. The visual identity was a familiar signpost. Customers felt betrayed and confused when they changed it without a good reason. You have to bring your audience along with you, not alienate them.

Simplicity is Usually the Right Answer (But Not Always)

Apple simplified. Dunkin' simplified. Google simplified. In a noisy world, clarity wins. However, Mailchimp's success shows that the opposite can also be true. If your personality is your competitive advantage, stripping it away to look like everyone else is a form of strategic suicide.

Don't Rebrand to Hide a Deeper Problem

A new logo and name won't fix a terrible product, poor customer service, or a broken company culture. Meta's rebrand attempts to firewall the future from the past, but it doesn't solve the underlying issues with Facebook. Rebranding is not a magic wand. It's a signal of change, but you must do the hard work of changing first.

Is It Your Turn?

Looking at these examples, you have to ask yourself some honest questions. Is your current brand telling the right story about your business today? Is it holding you back from where you need to go tomorrow? Or are you just bored with it?

Answering those questions honestly is the first step. Executing a strategic shift is complex. Proper company rebranding requires more than a new font; it demands brutal honesty about your business and where it needs to go.

If you're ready for that conversation, let's talk.

FAQs